Skip to main content

Table 5 Results on MIS and MVC problems compared to classic methods and supervised deep learning methods.\(^{1}\)

From: Gumbel-softmax-based optimization: a simple general framework for optimization problems on graphs

 

Graph Info

Classic

Supervised

Proposed

Name

Size

MD-Greedy

Greedy

SA

S2V-DQN

GCNGTS

GSOa/EvoGSOb

MIS

Cora

2708

1451

672

1390

1381

1451

\({1443}\)*

Citeseer

3327

\({1818}\)*

1019

1728

1705

1867

1795

PubMed

19,717

15,912

5353

14,703

15,709

15,912

\({15,886}\)*

MVC

Cora

2708

1257

2036

1318

1327

1257

\({1265}\)*

Citeseer

3327

\({1509}\)*

2308

1599

1622

1460

1533

PubMed

19,717

3805

14,364

5014

4008

3805

\({3831}\)*

  1. The best and the second best results are denoted in italic and asterisk, respectively
  2. aConfiguration: batch size = 128, fixed \(\tau\) = 1, learning rate = 0.01, \(\alpha\) = 3, and instance = 20
  3. bConfiguration: batch size = 512, fixed \(\tau\) = 1, learning rate = 0.01, \(\alpha\) = 3, instance = 20, cycle \(T_1\) = 100, substitution ratio 1/u = 1/8, cycle \(T_2\) = 10,000, mutation rate m = 0.001, and elite ratio = 0.0625