Skip to main content

Table 3 Statistics and final m-value of the Twitter follow dataset

From: A model of opinion and propagation structure polarization in social media

Hashtag

Nodes

Edges

Density

Average shortest path

Average clustering coefficient

Assortativity

Transitivity

m-value

\(\overline{q}_{\text{abs}}\)

 nepal

4242

42,833

0.0048

4.038

0.265

− 0.191

0.125

2.019

0.411

germanwings

2111

7329

0.0033

4.267

0.133

− 0.127

0.111

2.031

0.278

indiasdaughter

1542

9480

0.0079

3.614

0.184

− 0.078

0.174

2.042

0.446

mothersday

2245

14,160

0.0057

4.364

0.314

− 0.016

0.364

2.057

0.445

ff

3899

63,672

0.0084

3.696

0.328

0.072

0.277

2.076

0.432

onedirection

3151

20,275

0.0041

3.226

0.103

− 0.087

0.040

2.096

0.516

jurrasicworld

4395

31,802

0.0033

3.998

0.219

− 0.143

0.142

2.215

0.408

beefban

799

6026

0.0189

3.338

0.235

− 0.063

0.215

2.244

0.422

ukraine

3382

84,035

0.0146

3.104

0.302

− 0.89

0.256

2.300

0.511

baltimore

1441

28,291

0.0272

2.861

0.227

− 0.241

0.192

2.344

0.523

indiana

946

24,328

0.544

2.530

0.351

− 0.202

0.286

2.399

0.473

ultralive

2113

16,070

0.0072

2.464

0.359

− 0.250

0.031

2.504

0.699

leadersdebate

9566

344,088

0.0075

2.547

0.310

− 0.231

0.146

2.643

0.521

nemtsov

2156

46,529

0.0200

2.692

0.322

− 0.126

0.236

2.660

0.693

russiamarch

1189

16,471

0.0233

2.798

0.285

− 0.222

0.215

2.723

0.613

sxsw

4558

91,356

0.0088

2.638

0.257

− 0.135

0.086

2.824

0.619

netanyahu

4292

297,136

0.0322

2.341

0.329

− 0.274

0.183

2.896

0.563

gunsense

1821

103,840

0.0626

2.342

0.434

− 0.159

0.312

3.288

0.720

  1. Italic fonts indicate polarization