TY - JOUR AU - DeLellis, Pietro AU - DiMeglio, Anna AU - Garofalo, Franco AU - Lo Iudice, Francesco PY - 2017 DA - 2017/11/27 TI - Steering opinion dynamics via containment control JO - Computational Social Networks SP - 12 VL - 4 IS - 1 AB - In this paper, we model the problem of influencing the opinions of groups of individuals as a containment control problem, as in many practical scenarios, the control goal is not full consensus among all the individual opinions, but rather their containment in a certain range, determined by a set of leaders. As in classical bounded confidence models, we consider individuals affected by the confirmation bias, thus tending to influence and to be influenced only if their opinions are sufficiently close. However, here we assume that the confidence level, modeled as a proximity threshold, is not constant and uniform across the individuals, as it depends on their opinions. Specifically, in an extremist society, the most radical agents (i.e., those with the most extreme opinions) have a higher appeal and are capable of influencing nodes with very diverse opinions. The opposite happens in a moderate society, where the more connected (i.e., influential) nodes are those with an average opinion. In three artificial societies, characterized by different levels of extremism, we test through extensive simulations the effectiveness of three alternative containment strategies, where leaders have to select the set of followers they try to directly influence. We found that, when the network size is small, a stochastic time-varying pinning strategy that does not rely on information on the network topology proves to be more effective than static strategies where this information is leveraged, while the opposite happens for large networks where the relevance of the topological information is prevalent. SN - 2197-4314 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-017-0048-0 DO - 10.1186/s40649-017-0048-0 ID - DeLellis2017 ER -