Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary benchmark results comparing PBIL [ 19 ], degree and PageRank-based sequential algorithms, and the proposed greedy approach

From: Efficiently identifying critical nodes in large complex networks

Problem

| V |

| E |

K

PBIL

Degree

PageRank

Greedy

ErdosRenyi

235

350

50

6,700

1,086

1,953

3,011

ErdosRenyi

466

700

80

44,255

9,299

25,892

28,994

ErdosRenyi

941

1,400

140

225,576

123,947

113,752

116,135

ErdosRenyi

2,344

3,500

200

2,009,132

1,851,950

1,708,603

1,395,584

BarabasiAlbert

500

499

50

892

202

236

199

BarabasiAlbert

1,000

999

75

3,057

622

689

559

BarabasiAlbert

2,500

2,499

100

28,044

4,258

4,808

3,726

BarabasiAlbert

5,000

4,999

150

146,753

13,038

13,971

10,216

WattsStrogatz

250

1,246

70

13,768

16,110

16,110

16,110

WattsStrogatz

500

1,496

125

53,779

70,125

62,149

69,751

WattsStrogatz

1,000

4,996

200

308,596

319,600

319,600

319,600

WattsStrogatz

1,500

4,498

265

703,241

761,995

700,474

761,995

ForestFire

250

514

50

886

547

403

217

ForestFire

500

828

110

1,904

902

490

293

ForestFire

1,000

1,817

150

9,594

7,796

2,609

1,414

ForestFire

2,000

3,413

200

12,569

27,451

11,419

5,002

  1. Italic values indicate best solution per problem instance. Problem instances are those in [19].